Evidence and documents
Fair wear and tear vs damage (with examples)
Fair wear and tear is normal deterioration from living in the property; damage goes beyond that. Adjudicators compare check-in and check-out evidence, tenancy length, and whether the charge is proportionate — not just the landlord's word.
How to tell fair wear and tear from tenant damage in UK deposit disputes — real examples, what adjudicators weigh, and how to phrase your response.
“Fair wear and tear” is one of the most common phrases in deposit disputes — and one of the least understood. Landlords cannot charge you for deterioration that happens naturally from living in a property. But you can be charged for damage beyond that. The difference often decides whether you lose £50 or £500.
The core idea in plain English
Fair wear and tear is what you would expect after ordinary daily use over time: minor scuffs, faded paint in busy areas, carpet wear in doorways. Damage is harm beyond that: burns, broken items, large stains, unreported holes, or neglect. The longer you lived there and the more people in the property, the more wear is expected.
Examples: often fair wear and tear
- Light scuff marks on hallway walls after a 3-year tenancy with children
- Carpet flattening in main walkways — not stains or burns
- Faded paint near windows or switches in a 4+ year tenancy
- Minor nail holes from pictures if tenancy was several years (check contract)
- Loose door handle or worn kitchen worktop edge on old fittings
- Small marks on walls that match “fair wear” noted at check-in
Examples: more likely your responsibility
- Burn mark on kitchen worktop or carpet
- Large red wine or oil stain not present at check-in
- Broken window, door, or appliance due to misuse
- Hole in wall larger than minor picture fixing
- Pet urine damage when pets were not allowed
- Missing keys, remotes, or furniture listed on inventory
- Property left filthy beyond normal end-of-tenancy cleaning
What adjudicators weigh
- Length of tenancy — more wear expected after 3 years than 6 months
- Number of occupants — family of four vs single tenant
- Quality and age at check-in — old carpet vs new installation
- Check-in vs check-out comparison — the most important evidence
- Landlord’s repair history — issues reported but ignored
- Proportionality of cost — full replacement vs repair
Betterment — when they charge you to upgrade the property
You should not pay to leave the property in better condition than at check-in. Examples tenants often challenge: charging for brand-new carpet when only one corner was stained on a 10-year-old carpet; full house redecoration for minor marks; replacing a cheap older appliance with a premium new one.
Cleaning vs wear — a common overlap
Normal dust or light use is not the same as leaving the property unreasonably dirty. If you paid for professional cleaning or have move-out photos showing clean rooms, use them. If the landlord’s cleaning invoice is a generic flat fee with no itemisation, challenge it.
Common questions
Check-in said walls were “marked” — can they charge for marks at check-out?
Harder for them to charge fully if condition was similar. Use check-in wording and comparison photos.
Can they charge for entire carpet replacement for one stain?
Often disputed. Ask for invoice, carpet age, and why spot repair or partial replacement was not used.
Is nail hole filling always damage?
Depends on tenancy length and agreement. Minor holes after a long tenancy are often argued as wear.
They charged redecoration after 5 years — fair?
Paint naturally deteriorates. Minor scuffs after years of use are classic wear-and-tear arguments — especially with check-in photos.
Small scuff marks on walls after a two-year tenancy?
Often argued as wear, especially in hallways and high-traffic areas. Pair with check-in notes and photos showing similar condition at move-in.
Does “professional clean to professional standard” override wear and tear?
Cleaning and wear are different issues. You may owe reasonable end-of-tenancy cleaning — but you should not pay to redecorate or replace items simply because of normal use.
What about garden wear — dead lawn or worn paths?
Seasonal browning or light path wear after years of use can be wear. Neglect, unreported damage, or failure to maintain agreed standards may be treated differently — use photos and tenancy length.
They charged for a DIY repair I did myself badly?
If you caused new damage beyond wear, some charge may be fair — but the cost should reflect reasonable repair, not full replacement or upgrade. Ask for quotes and compare to check-in condition.
Ready to build your dispute pack?
Answer a few questions, upload evidence, and generate a structured response for £29 before you send it.